26 November 2016

"Ane absolute power to Cass, Annull & Dissable -- Contrair to Law..."

Last night, the Lord Advocate James Wolffe QC published the Scottish Government's written intervention in the Article 50 litigation. The case is scheduled to be heard by all eleven of the UK Supreme Court's Justices between the 5th and 8th of December.  

It is, as you'd expect, a weighty legal document which you may not find instantly digestible. A quick scan throws up a range of old constitutional familiars: the Claim of Right Act 1689, the Act of Union, the Sewel convention -- and even our old friend MacCormick v Lord Advocate. But what does all this mean? When you boil it all down, what is the Scottish Government really arguing for in the Brexit hearing? 

In a nutshell, James Wolffe is pursuing two distinct lines of argument. The first focuses on whether ministers can use the royal prerogative to activate Article 50 and the United Kingdom's departure from the European Union. The second concerns the so-called "Sewel" convention. Is Holyrood's consent constitutionally necessary, if Article 50 is to be activated? 

Let's start with the first line of argument. The royal prerogative is the name given to the residual legal powers of the crown. Its exercise entitles Her Majesty's government to enter treaties with foreign powers, or even to declare war, without reference to parliament. Earlier this year, the three judges of the Divisional Court held that Theresa May's government could not use the foreign affairs prerogative to activate Article 50. The Lord Chief held that Westminster must pass legislation, to begin disentangling Britain from the EU, and stripping away the rights in domestic law connected to it. The Scottish Government have weighed in behind this argument, but appeal to different sources.

The Lord Advocate invokes the preamble to the Claim of Right Act, passed by the old Scottish Parliament in 1689 in the aftermath of the eviction of King James VII and II from the country and the throne. Parliamentarians slammed James for having corrupted his rule "from a legall limited monarchy to ane Arbitrary Despotick power and in a publick proclamation asserted ane absolute power to cass annull and dissable all the lawes." Their 1689 Act states any attempt to use crown authority to "cass, annull and dissable" laws was itself "Contrair to Law." 

Here, the 1706 and 1707 Acts of Union warrant a passing mention. As James Wolffe points out, Article XVIII of the Acts provides that  "all other laws in use, within the Kingdom of Scotland, do after the union and notwithstandng thereof, remain in the same Force as before ... but alterable by the Parliament of Great-Britain." Notice the critical point here. "At the foundation of the United Kingdom, it was Parliament ... and not the Crown, which was given power to change the law of Scotland."  Read together, he suggests, these sources confirm the Divisional Court's judgment that it is for parliament -- not the crown in exercise of its royal prerogatives -- to alter the law of the land. 

Here the Scottish Government's argument shifts forwards, towards more contemporary sources. Wolffe argues that if Theresa May was entitled to use the prerogative to activate Article 50, its effect would hollow out a range of laws currently applicable in Scotland, including the Scotland Act, which "assumes the UK, including Scotland, is a member of the EU." The devolution legislation requires Holyrood to respect the rules and regulations of EU law. So too must Scottish ministers. "The effect of withdrawal from the EU", he contends, would be to "cass, annul or disable" these provisions - a step which the Lord Advocate concludes "may not, compatibly with the Claim of Right Act 1689, be effected by an act of the prerogative alone."

If the Supreme Court accepted this line of argument, it would be for the Westminster parliament to legislate for Article 50. But where stands Holyrood then? Here, the Lord Advocate's case shifts onto different terrain, and its second main theme. Is Holyrood's consent required or not to legislate for Article 50? As AV Dicey famously maintained, Westminster is sovereign under the British constitution. Between 1707 and 1998, MPs legislated for Scotland. Devolution didn't deprive the UK parliament of this power. This is recognised in the Scotland Act 1998 itself. Section 28(7) stresses that devolution "does not affect the power of the Parliament of the United Kingdom to make laws for Scotland."  

But since 1998, the interaction between the two parliaments has been governed by a constitutional convention, sometimes called the Sewel convention. The Scotland Act 2016 recognised the long-standing rule of constitutional morality that Westminster "will not normally legislate with regard to devolved matters without consent." This convention is generally regarded as having two limbs. Firstly, if the UK parliament wants to pass legislation in areas lying within Holyrood's powers - on health say, education, or family law - MPs should seek consent from MSPs. But beyond that, if Westminster legislation would expand or contract the powers of Scottish Parliament or its ministers, this too requires consent.  A good example of this was the additional powers devolved by the Scotland Act 2016 itself.

In his brief, the Lord Advocate argues that "withdrawal of the UK form the EU would alter the competence of the Scottish Parliament and Government, and the law applicable in Scotland within devolved competence. A Bill to authorise withdrawal would accordingly engage the legislative consent convention." Holyrood's consent, he says, must be sought. 

For the sake of argument, let's say that the UK Supreme Court agree with him. Then what? Does the convention have any legal teeth? Consider, for example, the eminently plausible scenario, that the majority in Holyrood refuses to give its consent to any Article 50 Bill, unless the UK government commits to pursuing the gentlest Brexit possible. Say also that Theresa May is unwilling to bow to this pressure, and presses on with an Article 50 Bill and the hardest of hard Brexits. Is the Lord Advocate seriously suggesting Holyrood has the legal power to frustrate Westminster? In law, does the Scottish Parliament hold a Brexit veto? The answer may disappoint you, and irate headline writers everywhere. 

If you read the Scottish Government's submissions carefully, they actually conclude Holyrood has no legal power to "block" an Article 50 Bill passed by Westminster.  If the UK parliament were to choose to pass an Act of Parliament without Holyrood's consent, the Lord Advocate concedes, "the courts could not decline to recognise the validity of the resulting Act." He accepts that Holyrood has no legal trump over Brexit. Politically, of course, overriding Holyrood and ignoring its objections would embroil the two governments and parliaments in a potentially poisonous constitutional crisis. 

And it is this opportunity to put Theresa May under political pressure which the Lord Advocate seems to be angling for in this intervention. What he is looking for is a direction from the Supreme Court that constitutionally, Holyrood should be consulted about any Article 50 Bill, whether or not Westminster respects Holyrood's conclusions. This, he suggests, "would not involve an impermissible interference with proceedings in Parliament" and would represent the Court fulfilling "its proper function of identifying the constitutional requirements."

It remains to be seen whether either of these lines of argument prosper. You can read the whole submission for yourself here.

55 comments :

  1. Westminster "will not normally legislate with regard to devolved matters without consent."

    Is there an argument that says Brexit after a referendum (the will of the people) is such an abnormal and unusual situation that the provisions do not apply?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We don't yet know how the Attorney-General, for the UK government, might react to the Lord Advocate's submissions here. The Sewel issues were not raised in the Divisional Court, and accordingly, were not discussed by the Lord Chief and his colleagues. But certainly, the government put the word "normally" in the 2016 Act for a reason and you could construct an argument along these lines.

      Delete
    2. The will of which people? The people of Scotland or the people of England and Wales (or the UK as a whole)? The current position is that the will of the people counts for nothing and parliament must consent to the UK government making the notification set out in Article 50 TEU as part of the process to withdraw the UK from the EU.

      Delete
    3. In a nutshell. Popular sovereignty remains a minority enthusiasm in this United Kingdom, especially legally.

      Delete
  2. It would have been good to have the views of Scotland's judges on record - Court of Session. This was not to be. That's one problem with interventions such as this. Pit nobody in Scotland took a case forward in the way that the claimants Miller and dos Santos have done.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Two sound Scots jurists on the UK Supreme Court, however.

      I'm sure Reed and Hodge will be able to contend with whatever is thrown at 'em.

      Delete
  3. "But alterable by the Parliament of Great-Britain." Notice the critical point here. "At the foundation of the United Kingdom, it was Parliament ... and not the Crown".

    Surely the question has to be asked: "who does the UK Parliament answers to?" IF it is her majesty's government[the Parliament of Great-Britain] then ultimately - it can be argued - that it IS the Crown who has the final say. Otherwise what's to stop 'the Crown' creating tiers of government, imposing whatever THEY decide through their 'given' rights - by the Crown - but as a separate entity the 'Crown' cannot be held responsible, despite creating this 'foundation' in the first place.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Who'd bet on the outcome? This constitutional law lark is a Dicey business.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wouldn't bet on it nor would I hang onto too much hope with it either.Screwed is the word I was looking for!

      Delete
  5. The Royal Prerogative. A labyrinth of smoke and mirrors in a bleak house, developed and constructed by a parcel of rogues, for the perpetual confusion of all who cross the threshold.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I slightly disagree with your summary of 86 which is not exhaustive of the possibilities. In addition it's not "and as in your "and would represent the Court fulfilling", it's "to", i.e. relative to the preceding "in this case".

    I think that's quite an important difference.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Made a mess of that, missed out a quote mark, here's that part again.

      In addition it's not "and" as in your "and would represent the Court fulfilling", it's "to", i.e. relative to the preceding "in this case".

      Delete
    2. I'm still not entirely sure I follow your point, I'm afraid....

      Delete
  7. Pace constitutional outrage, would it be technically possible for Westminster to repeal the Claim of Right Act, if necessary?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sure. Parliamentary sovereignty, and all that...

      Delete
    2. The question then arises would Holyrood, our judiciary and/or the People of Scotland stand for that?

      Secondly could not Holyrood simply pass it again or in a modern form? In which case parliamentary pinball would result.

      Operating your Jacobin sympathies, would you wish to go to the barricades in defence of it?

      Delete
  8. Thanks for this, Andrew. Fascinating that though the political challenge of Brexit is seemingly to the SNP, the constitutional challenge is to the Union itself. Unless "Union" is taken to mean "shut up and do as you're told."

    ReplyDelete
  9. Haven't read the Wolffe opinion but strikes me that withdrawing from the EU doesn't necessarily render unworkable the Scotland Act 1998's requirement that Scotland's devolved competence continue to conform to EU law. I mean, we could pass an Act to say that our law of, say, contract would be the same as, say, the Russian Federation's (to the extent compatible with EU law) without having to be a member of the RF. Another aspect of this is that English common law didn't cease to apply in colonies upon their becoming independent as republics and therefore exiting the British Empire.

    ReplyDelete

  10. Su trabajo es impresionante. Se comparte una cosa agradable con nosotros gracias. Vea también algunas frases de whatsapp y estados para whatsapp de amor que se compartirán con usted.estados para whatsapp Gracias por tu información

    ReplyDelete
  11. i am ERIC BRUNT by name. Greetings to every one that is reading this testimony. I have been rejected by my wife after three(3) years of marriage just because another Man had a spell on her and she left me and the kid to suffer. one day when i was reading through the web, i saw a post on how this spell caster on this address AKHERETEMPLE@gmail.com have help a woman to get back her husband and i gave him a reply to his address and he told me that a man had a spell on my wife and he told me that he will help me and after 3 days that i will have my wife back. i believed him and today i am glad to let you all know that this spell caster have the power to bring lovers back. because i am now happy with my wife. Thanks for helping me Dr Akhere contact him on email: AKHERETEMPLE@gmail.com
    or
    call/whatsapp:+2349057261346










    i am ERIC BRUNT by name. Greetings to every one that is reading this testimony. I have been rejected by my wife after three(3) years of marriage just because another Man had a spell on her and she left me and the kid to suffer. one day when i was reading through the web, i saw a post on how this spell caster on this address AKHERETEMPLE@gmail.com have help a woman to get back her husband and i gave him a reply to his address and he told me that a man had a spell on my wife and he told me that he will help me and after 3 days that i will have my wife back. i believed him and today i am glad to let you all know that this spell caster have the power to bring lovers back. because i am now happy with my wife. Thanks for helping me Dr Akhere contact him on email: AKHERETEMPLE@gmail.com
    or
    call/whatsapp:+2349057261346

    ReplyDelete
  12. My Name is Steve Jones from Canada, i turn to a vampire any time i want to, I become a real vampire because of how people treat me, This world is a wicked world and not fair to any body. At the snack of my finger things are made happened. Am now a powerful vampire and no one step on me without an apology goes free. I turn to human being also at any time i want to. And am one of the most dreaded and respected person in my country. i am now also very famous and rich with the help of the VAMPIRES EMPIRE. i get what ever a want. i become a vampire through the help of my friend who introduce me into a vampire Kingdom by given me their email: jamessuccessfultemple45@gmail.com, if you want to become a powerful and a real vampire kindly contact the vampire kingdom on their email: jamessuccessfultemple45@gmail.com for help. it is real. Contact them today. jamessuccessfultemple45@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  13. This is such a great resource that you are providing and you give it away for free. insta stalker

    ReplyDelete
  14. The film is always kept exciting through the tense robbery scenes, https://floorrefinishingmariettaga.com/ character actions and a plot about a man and his power.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Nice blog. Find best coupons deals on the link below
    promo Code

    ReplyDelete

  16. Thanks for the info. Am here to inform everyone that my lover came back 2days after I order Dr Obodo love spell best Xmas ever gift ever 💝 💝 For recommendations ( (( templesofanswer@hotmail . co . uk WhatsApp +234 8155 42548-1 )) )

    ReplyDelete
  17. Very help full info thanks for great content Love Shayari

    ReplyDelete
  18. Hi there! Nice stuff, do keep me posted when you post again something like this!

    best dental surgeon in Lahore

    ReplyDelete
  19. Thanks for the blog post buddy! Keep them coming...

    Quran lessons online

    ReplyDelete
  20. The internet has become the place for people to store their important data's like pictures documents and lots of more. With the web storage service you'll get an honest.Hardware development

    ReplyDelete
  21. Nice post mate, keep up the great work, just shared this with my friends.

    stock software for small business

    ReplyDelete
  22. Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your weblog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed browsing your blog posts. After all I’ll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you write again soon!

    best dental clinic in Lahore

    ReplyDelete
  23. Great content material and great layout. Your website deserves all of the positive feedback it’s been getting.

    dental implant surgery in Lahore

    ReplyDelete
  24. An interesting dialogue is price comment. I feel that it is best to write more on this matter, it may not be a taboo topic however usually individuals are not enough to talk on such topics. To the next. Cheers.

    Pakistani ladies clothing brands

    ReplyDelete
  25. Great post, and great website. Thanks for the information!

    pos system for small grocery stores

    ReplyDelete
  26. This blog website is pretty cool! How was it made !

    online Quran tutors by rate

    ReplyDelete
  27. Wow, What an Outstanding post. I found this too much informatics. It is what I was seeking for. I would like to recommend you that please keep sharing such type of info.If possible, Thanks.

    cosmetic dentistry in Lahore

    ReplyDelete
  28. Hi there! Nice post! Please tell us when I will see a follow up!

    point of sale software

    ReplyDelete
  29. I have to say wholeheartedly I believe Oniha is a gifted individual and gentle in his second nature. I have received the most rewarding and spiritual experience whilst conversing with him on the telephone. I heard and saw an angel in my mind-eye. It was so overwhelming. I knew at that moment finally my difficulties were over. He deserves recognition for his power and talents as a beautiful individual who brings spirit close to those in need. I have been touched deeply,nothing has come as close to me before. I am in total awe and have a great deal of respect. Thank you Dr Oniha for reuniting me with my estranged husband. Anyone who needs relationship help should contact this man and he will help you.
    onihaspelltemple@gmail.com
    CALL/Whatsapp number: +16692213962
    Website:https://onihaspells.com   

    ReplyDelete
  30. Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your weblog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed browsing your blog posts. After all I’ll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you write again soon! Wholesale Women Joggers UK
    Men Joggers Wholesale Prices

    ReplyDelete
  31. I'm really enjoying the design and layout of your website. It's a very easy on the eyes which makes it much more pleasant for me to come here and visit more often. Did you hire out a designer to create your theme? Excellent work! Small Business Bookkeeping Services
    Accounting and Bookkeeping Services Melbourne

    ReplyDelete
  32. I think this is one of the most significant information for me. And i’m glad reading your article. But should remark on some general things, The web site style is perfect, the articles is really great : D. Good job, cheers Best SMM Panel
    SMM Reseller Panel

    ReplyDelete
  33. It’s really a great and helpful piece of information. I’m satisfied that you simply shared this useful info with us. Please keep us informed like this. Thank you for sharing. best smm services in usa
    ppc services new york

    ReplyDelete
  34. I absolutely love your website articles and find almost all of your releases to be what precisely I’m looking for many years. Does one offer guest post content writers to write content available for you? Please help me i need content writer like you and Thanks for this post. all the best. Essay Help - statistics homework help - college homework help

    ReplyDelete
  35. Our Law Assignment Help writers in the USA can handle practically any assignment, from comprehending the law to applying it to real-world problems. We work hard to match the suitable writer to your assignment topic to provide you with the best possible solution to enhance your learning and comprehension.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Thanks for sharing this unique content. Our Roadrunner email support is a customer care helpline number that is offered by one of the world's best Technical services providers in the USA. To read more about our Roadrunner Email Problems visit our webpage.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Thank you for sharing the useful post. A reader got a lot of information from this post and utilized it in their research. I also provide independent support for the outlook email. So if you are facing issues with the outlook account then contact me for outlook support phone number.
    Also Read: Outlook not connecting to server | Outlook send receive error

    ReplyDelete
  38. Do Online Shopping in Pakistan from Pakistani best shopping brands and find your desired products from brands at reasonable price.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Do Online Shopping in Pakistan from Pakistani best shopping brands and find your desired products from brands at reasonable price.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Do Online Shopping in Pakistan from Pakistani best shopping brands and find your desired products from brands at reasonable price.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Do Online Shopping in Pakistan from Pakistani best shopping brands and find your desired products from brands at reasonable price.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Do Online Shopping in Pakistan from Pakistani best shopping brands and find your desired products from brands at reasonable price.

    ReplyDelete
  43. I'm so excited my broken Marriage has been restored and my husband is back after he left me and our 2 kids for another woman. After 8 years of marriage, me and my husband have been into one quarrel or the other until he finally left me and moved to be with another woman. I felt my life was over and my kids thought they would never see their father again. I tried to be strong just for the kids but I could not control the pains that tormented my heart, my heart was filled with sorrows and pains because I was really in love with my husband. Every day and night I think of him and always wish he would come back to me, I was really upset and I needed help, so I searched for help online and I came across a website that suggested that Dr Oniha can help get ex back fast. So, I felt I should give him a try. I contacted him and he told me what to do and I did it, then he did a (Love spell) for me. 48 hours later, my husband really called me and told me that he misses me and the kids so much, So Amazing!! So that was how he came back that same day, with lots of love and joy, and he apologized for his mistake, and for the pain he caused me and the kids. Then from that day, our Marriage was now stronger than how it was before, All thanks to Dr Oniha.I will continue to tell everyone about how your spell works Dr Oniha because you are a God sent to me. You can also contact him if you need help to solve your problem, he will be of help to you.
    EMAIL:ONIHASPELLTEMPLE@GMAIL.COM
    Call/Whatsapp number: +16692213962
    WEBSITE http://onihaspells.com

    ReplyDelete