tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1638916042737526171.post3440852413451220277..comments2024-03-28T07:16:39.621+00:00Comments on Lallands Peat Worrier: Baffling PoppycockLallands Peat Worrierhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18276270498204697708noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1638916042737526171.post-62655727480996009002013-11-17T22:24:29.893+00:002013-11-17T22:24:29.893+00:00Martin,
A fair point, made by a fair few folk on ...Martin,<br /><br />A fair point, made by a fair few folk on twitter. In my defence, I plead youth, inexperience, and being born in the middle of the 1980s.Lallands Peat Worrierhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07238432265194046726noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1638916042737526171.post-11741111568936349592013-11-17T20:02:56.557+00:002013-11-17T20:02:56.557+00:00LPW, a good analysis, notwithstanding that Oswald ...LPW, a good analysis, notwithstanding that Oswald fired from the Texas Schoolbook Depository, not the grassy knoll. Martinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11219870920638914624noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1638916042737526171.post-74664155229886594042013-11-16T13:15:25.122+00:002013-11-16T13:15:25.122+00:00Ewan,
Me too. An example would be helpful. Clearl...Ewan,<br /><br />Me too. An example would be helpful. Clearly the Lord Advocate has given him some sort of undertaking or the other, but I'm blowed if I can find it anywhere online. I suspect he may return to this theme at some point before we're through. Kenny also made some reference to the idea in his speech to <a href="http://www.snp.org/blog/post/2013/oct/kenny-macaskill-conference-address" rel="nofollow">October's SNP conference.</a> It doesn't do much to clear away the fug either.<br /><br /><i>"Let me be quite clear – the removal for the routine requirement for corroboration does not mean that anyone will be prosecuted simply on the say so of one individual, whether a police officer or a victim of crime. That has been made quite clear by the Lord Advocate, who has invoked both a qualitative and quantitative test for prosecutions. There will always require to be supportive evidence and the case will be look at as a whole."</i> Lallands Peat Worrierhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07238432265194046726noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1638916042737526171.post-18358832088074296162013-11-16T13:12:06.752+00:002013-11-16T13:12:06.752+00:00The release of Al-Megrahi?The release of Al-Megrahi?Lallands Peat Worrierhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07238432265194046726noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1638916042737526171.post-76109615811507376892013-11-16T09:51:41.028+00:002013-11-16T09:51:41.028+00:00I'm at a loss to understand what he means and ...I'm at a loss to understand what he means and he should be asked to clarify with an example. You helpfully give examples to explain your analysis and rules of evidence are almost impossible understand in the abstract.Ewanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08164790608082005605noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1638916042737526171.post-57947628738137781922013-11-15T19:17:25.641+00:002013-11-15T19:17:25.641+00:00I've been seriously hacked off with Kenny sinc...I've been seriously hacked off with Kenny since 20th August 2009, but it was only last month when I heard him speak at Perth that I realised I want him replaced as Justice Minister. My impression was that he has become a one man band who believes that he knows best and so he will railroad his preferred course of action through regardless of the views of any other interested parties.Rolfehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17849975010197698907noreply@blogger.com